Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Carl,

my impression as a bystander is that the IETF has decided that sole source contracts (where only one contractor is permitted to bid) are, in general, a Bad Idea.

The Secretariat contract had very special circumstances, which caused it to be sole sourced, but I interpreted the words from Leslie's timeline:

May 7 2006[IASA]
	Request for Vendor Expressions of Interest

to mean a public request, where more than one organization is welcome to show interest.

Continuity has value, but I think it is up to the IASA to determine how continuity is weighted against other factors.

        Harald (who has only public knowledge at this point)

--On torsdag, mars 16, 2006 18:16:22 -0800 Carl Malamud <carl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Carl -- did you get the other message (the one with
the timeline)?

Yes, I did.  Not having been party to the discussions, I'm
not quite sure what is going on.  We did a sole source
re-assignment of the IETF secretariat.  As I said in my
note, I'm curious about:

1. the opinion from the RFC-Editor about this, in particular
the charter.
2. what the IAB/IAOC is thinking ... this could be a sole
source reassignment or a simple renewal.

I appreciate that a lot of thought obviously went into
preparing your two notes, I'd just like to hear some of
the background.

Best regards,

Carl

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf






_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]