Re: Beyond China's independent root-servers -- Expanding and Fixing Domain Notation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 12:26:23AM -0800,
 Jefsey Morfin, disguised as Mohsen BANAN
<lists-ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
 a message of 551 lines which said:

> The Internet technical community is now given a unique opportunity

There is nothing to do for the IETF or the "Internet technical
community" (whatever it is). The problem is 100 % political and should
be addressed in ICANN / WSIS / IGF / whatever but not in the IETF.

> About 4 years ago, in a note with the subject of:
> Forward Domain Notation (FDN):
> ------------------------------
>    The new forward notation for domains.
>    This notation includes a
>      "Name Resolution Selector (NRS)"
>    For example:
> 	r1:org.ietf.www

You simply have a new root, the one which will decide who gets r1, who
gets r2, etc. This is simply playing with words, like the ITU when
they claim the telephone has no root (simply because the equivalent of
the root zone file is hardwired in the international exchanges).

And you break a nice property of the DNS, the consistency of naming
(the separator is the same, whatever the level, or the zone you're
in).

>  - Support implicit name resolution selection.  This is essentail
>  for the transition period.

This is simply a default, hardwired in the name server. Every Web
browser has it (try typing "ibm", without the ".com" in your
browser). You will not get a Nobel prize for this.

> Each Root-Server Cluster runs its root serves 
                                         ^^^^^^
                                         Nice typo

> I am likely not to further participate in this thread.

What a relief!


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]