This empty appendix was removed in draft 02. As Russ stated before, an IPR disclosure has been posted to the IETF IPR page which can be found at: Stefan Santesson Program Manager, Standards Liaison Windows Security -----Original Message----- From: Bill Strahm [mailto:bill@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: den 20 februari 2006 02:21 To: Russ Housley Cc: Bill Fenner; tls@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; iesg@xxxxxxxx; Steven M. Bellovin Subject: Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard I saw all of the huff, and while I agree with it, I am more concerned about Appendix A. IPR Disclosure TBD What does that mean, and more specifically is a document with a TBD section really ready for last call at all ? Bill Russ Housley wrote: > I misunderstood the original question. I'll get it fixed or withdraw > the Last Call. > > Russ > > > At 12:38 AM 2/19/2006, Bill Fenner wrote: > >> >Can we have a Proposed Standard >> >without the IETF having change control? >> >> No. RFC3978 says, in section 5.2 where it describes the derivative >> works limitation that's present in draft-santesson-tls-ume, "These >> notices may not be used with any standards-track document". >> >> Bill > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf