John,
Both valid comments, which are in the tracker, but #1 is
explicitly not a DISCUSS (see the 5th bullet of section 3.2
of http://www.ietf.org/u/ietfchair/discuss-criteria.html).
Thanks
Brian
john.loughney@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this
specification (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-server-override-03.tx
t
My feeling is that this document needs some revision, at least to cover
the IANA section, and perhaps my point raised about the introduction.
1) Intro says:
There are many situations where the DHCP relay is involved and can
insert a relay agent option with appropriate suboptions easily into
DHCP DISCOVER messages.
Of course, this begs the question - what are those situations? Anyhow,
I think the intro is a bit short on motivation for this suboption.
2) IANA Section says:
5. IANA Considerations
IANA is requested to assign a suboption number for the Server
Identifier Override Suboption from the DHCP Relay Agent Information
Option [3] suboption number space. None.
I don't understand what the 'None.' refers to.
John
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf