Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I saw all of the huff, and while I agree with it, I am more concerned about

Appendix A. IPR Disclosure

   TBD

What does that mean, and more specifically is a document with a TBD section really ready for last call at all ?

Bill
Russ Housley wrote:
I misunderstood the original question. I'll get it fixed or withdraw the Last Call.

Russ


At 12:38 AM 2/19/2006, Bill Fenner wrote:

>Can we have a Proposed Standard
>without the IETF having change control?

No.  RFC3978 says, in section 5.2 where it describes the derivative
works limitation that's present in draft-santesson-tls-ume, "These
notices may not be used with any standards-track document".

  Bill



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]