Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:

Andy Bierman writes:

I think you missed my point.
I should have said "enforce or abide by draconian rules".
Automating the process is even worse.
Then stupid scripts disrupt WG activity on a regular basis.
Inappropriate mailing list use should be dealt with by the
WG Chair(s) in a more diplomatic manner.

Well, one option is to stop trying to restrict access to lists to
begin with.  The problem with having a human being make the decision
is that human beings are notoriously biased.

If we did this, our mailing lists would be bombarded with SPAM
from non-subscribers.
There is an appeals process (of that we are too painfully aware)
that can be used for people who are told by a WG Chair that
they are using the mailing list in an inappropriate manner, and still
insist on continuing their behavior.

I have found that only the worst managers deal with
bad apples by burdening the entire group with oppressive rules.

Andy


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]