Brian E Carpenter wrote: > A practice I used when I was diffserv chair and we had quite a lot > of off-topic postings was to create a second list, diffserv-interest > (which still exists BTW). The rule for diffserv@xxxxxxxx was "must > be relevant to a chartered work item" and the rule for diffserv-interest > was "must be relevant to diffserv technology." Though I never participated in diffserv WG activities, which was chartered wrongly from the beginning, your chairing strategy explains why the result of the WG is technically meaningless. > People only interested > in the standards work simply ignored the -interest list. They ignored the -interest list and the technology. Masataka Ohta _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf