John Cowan writes: > Filtering him out individually, as I do, is insufficient: one still must > read the polite or exasperated responses of others. I am almost at the > point where I will filter any posting that so much as *mentions* him. Why don't you do that, then, so that he need not be banned just for your convenience? > In addition, I have been the direct victim of Jefsey's spleen: he > stepped outside the IETF context to send a request to my then employer > to have me disciplined by that employer for "unprofessional conduct". > As a result, my employer ordered me not to respond to him any more, > but since I have now left that employer, I will take this one action. > I will not stoop to taking revenge in kind, as I want nothing more than > never to hear from him or of him again. But you still mention irrelevant matters external to this mailing list in your post. Any personal problem you may have with someone outside the list (or vice versa) is completely unrelated to IETF work or mailing lists, and the inconvenience you suffer from having to press the delete key is also only very tenuously linked to this list. Maybe your employer's advice wasn't so bad. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf