Michael Thomas writes: > Perhaps we should take a lesson from TCP and set a receive window > on IETF mailing lists in the face of conjestion. The sender is thus > obligated to keep the transmission within the window, and as a side > effect to consider the quality of the, um, quantity. Just this simple > step would greatly limit (purposeful) DOS attacks and other death > spirals. It also mitigates the "free speech" attacks by not throttling > based on content (which is inherently contentious), but based on > wg mailing list "bandwidth". Sounds fine to me ... but I know it would never fly. Some people consider themselves "more equal than others" and would object as soon as their "important" posts were rejected, no matter how much traffic they were generating. And they'd point to the occasional posters and insist that their infrequent posts were far less worthy of inclusion on the list. And so on. In other words, it would be fair, but fairness is not what most people want. They want total freedom for themselves, but heavy restrictions for everyone else. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf