From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx>
At 2:28 PM -0500 1/19/06, Richard Shockey wrote:
It's a classic example of the current IETF fashion for process over
substance.
Fully agree. What is the justification for this becoming an RFC?
Well, backing up slightly ...
How much of our process stuff (including existing BCPs) really needs to be
published as an RFC?
Some does, I suppose, but "never changes" doesn't seem like the model we
should search for on venue selection (the venue selection model used for the
first 10 IETF meetings probably wouldn't have even booked us into
Minneapolis, much less Adelaide!).
Having said this, I hope the IAOC does find this document useful input
(because if they don't, people have sure been wasting zeros and ones on THIS
list...
Thanks,
Spencer
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf