On Wednesday, January 18, 2006 08:30:56 AM +0100 Harald Tveit Alvestrand
<harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I oppose approval of this document as-is.
Four reasons:
1) FCFS is inappropriate
2) The document gives inadequate context for use
3) The document gives inadequate procedures
Agree.
4) The definition of "automobile" is wrong
Eh. It's a protocol constant; they can define it however they want.
As long as they let me register 'wyoming' to mean the entity is in a
fictional location.
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf