Re: Normative figures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Scott" == Scott W Brim <sbrim@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Scott> On 01/09/2006 10:41 AM, Sam Hartman allegedly wrote:
    >> Are you looking for normative figures?  If so, can you point to
    >> an example where you think they are necessary?  (I'd like to
    >> avoid a discussion of packet diagrams for the moment if that's
    >> OK)

    Scott> Normative figures perhaps.  Normative equations definitely.

    Scott> Is there any input format for *just* equations (or
    Scott> figures), standing by themselves, which we can agree is
    Scott> open, standardized, stable and deterministic in output?

Mmm.  I have some significant accessibility concerns with that if you
expect me to review the documents.  I think that's a small (although
probably impossible at the current point) matter of technology.


If you go so far as normative figures I have a lot more questions
about why and what you are trying to accomplish.

--Sam


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]