>>>>> "Frank" == Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Frank> Sam Hartman wrote:
>>> Some folks including me were surprised that there's no "IETF
>>> last call" for experimental RFCs, unless they are the product
>>> of an IETF WG (4.2.3).
>> That's actually not true. The responsible AD can issue a last
>> call for an experimental draft.
Frank> Where do I miss that provision in 2026, is it something
Frank> covered by chapter 9 (variance procedure) ?
It's certainly current IESG procedure that we can last call
informationals and experimentals. I don't know that 2026 does or
needs to say anything about it. Unless it is forbidden it seems like
a reasonable decision making tool for the IESG to apply in some cases.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf