Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In <4399C0C6.48EB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Result of this experiment (last state that I've heard of):
> Absolutely nobody evaluates "spf2.0/pra".

fyi;

There have been a couple of people who have run stats on the usage of
spf2.0/pra vs SPF.  It *is* being used, but no where near as much as
SPF.


-wayne


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]