It is easy to give glib answers to the following questions, ignoring many detailed issues. Easy, but suspect. Bob Braden > >The issues under discussion should be: (1) whether the RFC Editor >should publish RFCs in some XML-based structural document descriptor >language, (2) whether this should be in particular the DTD defined in >RFC 2629, (3) whether an XML version should be co-authoritative with an >ASCII version or should be primary or secondary to the ASCII version, >(4) if an XML version is to be published as authoritative, how to >ensure that it is correct and consistent with the ASCII version, if >any. > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf