> Hence the desire to have the RFC Editor use xml2rfc, rather than nroff. I don't think publishing the xml2rfc test is such a good idea. Xml2rfc is a preparation format. The printed result is a combination of the xml2rfc input and a formatting program of some kind. This formatting program is bound to change over time, e.g. when templates change. You want to archive the final result, not the initial input. -- Christian Huitema _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf