Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Wednesday, 16 November, 2005 22:09 +0200 Jari Arkko
<jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Nevertheless, as the central proposal in John's draft appears
> to be the inclusion of IESG/IAB in the potential signing
> members
> I still fail to see why this is necessary. If the issue is of
> wide enough relevance and serious, the management surely
> finds people (privately or publicly) that care enough to sign.

I think it is socially undesirable for IAB or IESG members to go
around in secret, finding people to sign things for them.  While
there is no way to avoid that should IESG or IAB members decide
they prefer that course of action, I'd much prefer to encourage
the people who actually have the complaints to come forward, in
public, and identify and explain them.   Sunshine just seems a
lot healthier to me than forcing people to organize conspiracies.

YMMD, of course.

     john



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]