Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I agree with Geoff.

My theory is, if the projector bulb blows out the second before you go on, and the spare is also dead (you'd be surprised how common that is), you should be able to get
your points (or, at least the most important ones) across regardless.

If all there is is sharing of ppt and pdf, might as well do it by email.

Marshall

On Nov 15, 2005, at 1:17 PM, Geoff Huston wrote:

At 01:50 PM 12/11/2005, John wrote:
To avoid extra overload from the co-chairs during the session, and if we want to make it more strict, if any of the presenters is not done with
his/her slides, he will not be able to talk.


"more strict"????

sorry, but that's just not on - if all we are these days as a meeting is a powerpoint pack swap session, then we may as well pack up all this ietf stuff and all go away right now!

I appreciate that powerpoint does enable complex concepts to be conveyed with some ease, and that it (and its functional equivalants) is in heavy use these days, but I would be very worried if we get to a state that Jordi appears to be advocating where a) powerpoint is a mandatory precondition for presenting at a WG meeting and b) you must present according to a previously deposited and circulated powerpoint script. We all do our best in terms of priorities, schedules and network stability to get this material up prior to a WG session, and sometimes it all works, and sometimes, despite our best of intentions, it does not.

Geoff



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]