Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publi cation in proprietary formats at ietf.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Juergen Schoenwaelder writes:

> Every little open source software project uses version control systems
> these days. The IETF does not. And interestingly, the IETF even likes
> to standardize this stuff (look at the WebDAV RFCs). Personally, I
> liked CVS and I do even more appreciate SVN these days (which is
> actually a superset of WebDAV).
>
> I would love if the IETF could _offer_ subversion services for WGs who
> want to use this. It would be nice to be able to simple modify a
> document and post the diff in a common format instead of the arcane
>
> OLD:
>
> NEW:
>
> format which really boils the ocean if you have to rename/rewrite
> something throughout a document.

If the IETF needs all RFCs in plain text, why would it not also need
plain text for version control?



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]