*> *> Bob Braden wrote: *> *> > *> *> > *> > It just struck me as odd that people were grousing about ASCII's *> > *> appearance when PDF is available. *> > *> *> > *> People will stop complaining when the ASCII version is allowed to sa *> > *> "see diagram in the PDF version". *> > *> *> > *> Y(J)S *> > *> *> > *> > Huh? That has always been allowed. What am I missing? *> *> Please can we be quite clear on this - for the record: *> *> I can include a normative diagram in the .pdf version of an RFC *> (that is too complex to produce in ASCII art), and say in the *> normative text of the ASCII version the diagram you need to *> implement this protocol is in the .pdf version of this RFC? No, the .ps/.pdf is not allowed to be normative. Bob Braden _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf