Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:45:40 -0800
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4378E1D9.7070100@xxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Reply-to: dcrocker@xxxxxxxx
Sender: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.4 (Windows/20050908)

People will stop complaining when ...


Right on the nail



I suspect you underestimate our ability to keep complaining.

d/
--

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
  - From: Yaakov Stein
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
  - From: Stewart Bryant

Prev by Date: Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
Next by Date: RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
Previous by thread: Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
Next by thread: RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]