On Nov 8, 2005, at 4:26 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
BTW, does anyone who knows IETF and the RFC-editor function better than I do, can tell why RFC 2629 is not the mandatory official format for RFC, even now after six years?
My guess is that it is not a trivial matter to convert RFCs submitted in other forms into 2629 xml format. And though I prefer to use xml2rfc, there are many people desiring some of the word processor features (track changes, etc...) that are just not found in the xml authoring tools.
-andy _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf