Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





It certainly makes sense to reword it for a pattern of difficulty or exclusion.

On any of these criteria, since this is the IETF, it might make sense to subject them to rough consensus criteria. I.e a country that is being considered for a future meeting could be vetted on the IETF list.


Sorry. As usual, I hit 'send' too quickly and thereby entirely missed the real point I meant to make:

Getting the IETF community involved in rounds of debate about acceptable national policies is certain be be unproductive and likely to be destructive. We already have countries upset with us for making decisions based on solid engineering preferences. What is likely to be the result of our pretending to be able to make decision on politically acceptable national behavior?

On the other hand, the nice thing about pursuing a rough consensus community decision is that it does not matter what basis each of us uses. We do not need debate. We simply need voices saying yay or nay.

d/

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]