Excuse me Stéphane, but I do not find these comments constructive.
Anyone planning an international meeting for 1000+ people has
to take a great many things seriously that you seem to think
are amusing. We had some serious security problems in Paris,
for example.
Brian
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:29:40AM +0200,
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
a message of 37 lines which said:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-00.txt
(Now -01)
Next drafts : "How to select appropriate dining room for a Meeting",
"IETF bathroom requirements", ...
The airport should be of such capacity to accommodate 60% of the
attendees arriving and departing on the same day, in addition to the
usual number of passengers.
IETF MUST NOT hold a meeting in a location where the international
airport is not IETF-compliant and open-standards-based.
The traveling to the venue location should be possible with a
maximum of one flight hop from a major hub. The airport must have a
diversity of international carriers.
The location MUST be accessible to IETF members with a TTL of 1.
If there is already a WLAN in the building can be turned off
The IETF MUST NOT accept competing WLAN access.
Appropriate warnings (e.g. about local crime risks) must be given.
The IETF MUST NOT hold meetings in Baghdad or New Orleans for the
foreseeable future.
Appropriate warnings about local risks of hurricanes, flooding,
tsunami or earthquakes must be given.
[Good bye, California.]
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf