Thank you Mr. Chairman. I read your explanation. And I try to think the best protocol. Just for that case. . the person who thinks he is hurt castigates Dean. . he sues Dean. . he starts the judgement against Dean. . he writes the accusation. . he asks the Jury to decide without decorum and defense. . he belongs to Judges. . he belongs to appeal Judges. I do not know that person, but when is the process to castigate him if he is wrong? Who would then pay damages to Dean? Dean is technically in desadvantage. Then I must oppose. Eduardo Mendez 2005/10/10, Brian E Carpenter <brc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Eduardo Mendez wrote: > > Can someone explain what is this? > > I assume you have read RFC 3683. That should explain what this is. > > > Is it issued by the IESG? > > Yes. > > > Is this a procecussion? > > Do you mean "prosecution"? No. It's a proposed action under RFC 3683. > > > Where is the defense of Dean? > > That is up to him. > > > Has the Last Call started? > > Yes. This message started it. > > > When does it finish? > > 06 November 2005, as stated in the message. > > Brian - _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf