Well put. Actually I have yet to see ANYONE refute any of the examples Harald made about inappropriate acts. Nothing but "I don't support this action universally." THAT sounds a lot like not tolerating disagreement. -Tom > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of kent crispin > Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 10:20 PM > To: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: On PR-actions, signatures and debate > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:46:22AM +0200, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: > > How? People who cannot tolerate disagreement are very poor at > > discussing most things, anyway, since they become upset as soon as > > anyone expresses an opinion different from their own. > > Toleration of disagreement has almost nothing to do with it. > Instead, it's more a matter of signal to noise ratio on a > limited bandwidth channel. If you fill up a list with > ignorant drivel, people who don't have time to deal with > drivel will go away, leaving the list to those who produce > the drivel. > That's the problem. I've seen it happen many times. > > -- > Kent Crispin > kent@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf