> > For example, consider two college roommates. One wishes to > exercise > > his freedom of expression by listing to music until 3 AM in the > > morning (without the benefit of headphones, of course!). The other > > wishes to exercise his right to get sufficient sleep so as > to be well > > rested for the big exam the following morning. Clearly, each > > roommate, taken individually, is exercising a reasonable > freedom, but > > in this case they have come into conflict. > > The student listening to music need only put on headphones, > then they will both be happy. It's a poor analogy. > Need implies accepting someone elses constraints. That's a poor simplification, because 100 people could tell someone that they "need" to stop posting friviously and harming list progress, and they can still chose to ignore it if there are no teeth to the rules. -T
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf