Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In message <433DA1BD.1060707@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Mealling writes:
>Steven M. Bellovin wrote:

>Reexamine the premises....
>

I am -- these are my premises.  I lived far too long in the uucp world 
to enjoy non-unique names; they led to nothing but trouble.

Some of the other requirements are security requirements, and that's 
what I do for a living. 

I agree that the current DNS has serious problems, most notably in the 
trademark sphere.  That doesn't mean that its other premises are wrong; 
there are other navigational systems that yield unique results besides 
treees.

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]