In message <200509241710.NAA13442@xxxxxxxx>, "Nicholas Staff" writes: > > I hope that we can discuss this as soon as possible. Until then, I >> will try to refrain from sending any more messages on this topic as I >> don't believe that this will be productive. People on this mail list >> might want to consider to do the same thing. >> >> Thanks, >> >> David Kessens >> Operations & Management Area Director > >I agree this is not the forum for this discussion, but since you publicized >your attack I think he's entitled to at least one public dissent. I'd be >happy to agree with you by the way if you could show me anything that >amounted to the abuse you claim (abuse from Dean that is). Anyway, barring >that I'll list the 1,000 reasons why I think you're wrong in my email to the >IESG. I'm sorry, David's note wasn't an "attack" -- it was David excercising his responsibility as an AD. Have a look at Section 2 of RFC 3683 -- to revoke someone's posting rights, he *must* make a public statement on the IETF mailing list. --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf