I wrote: > 3. The proposed initial registry contains subtags based only on the > existing standards: ISO 639-1 and 639-2, ISO 3166-1, ISO 15924, and > United Nations M.49, as well as "variant" and "grandfathered" subtags > based on the RFC 3066 registry. Should have been: "variant" subtags and "grandfathered" tags There is no such thing in the draft as a grandfathered subtag. -- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf