I really hate lists with "reply-to" pointing to the list.
I know when I want to reply to the list, and when I want to reply
individually to the sender. When reply-to points to the list, it is
extremely difficult with most mailers to send a reply to the originator.
Yours,
Joel
At 11:49 AM 8/26/2005, you wrote:
On 26-aug-2005, at 10:33, Peter Dambier wrote:
Hi Jeroen,
I forwared your message - not replying to show your headder:
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
So you had sent to moore@xxxxxxxxxxx
ietf@xxxxxxxx received only a copy. Some people might have got
nothing.
My own Mozilla/Thunderbird behaves the same way:
I would have had to manually change to/cc for all recipients.
That is what we all need to do now if I got it correctly.
No, what needs to happen if we collectively decide we don't want the
current behavior is that the mailinglist software sets a "reply-to"
header, so when you hit "reply" or "group reply" your reply is sent
with the list in the "To:" field and nothing else. This used to work
well, not sure if modern clients handle this correctly, though. Try
to reply to this message to see what happens.
(BTW I got so fed up with receiving endless CCs for each discussion
thread I've ever posted to (you can actually manually remove those,
people!) that I now have procmail remove all messages with duplicate
msgids.)
Iljitsch
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf