Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 MARID <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 08:47:17AM -0400,
 Andrew Newton <andy@xxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 21 lines which said:

> If this is the source of the conflict, then BOTH experiments should
> not use the v=spf1 records.

It is an absolutely incredible request since SPF uses these records
since its beginning (a long time before Sender-ID existed) and since
there is (unlike SenderID) actual deployment, which can not be called
back.

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]