Russ Allbery wrote: ...
I think your criteria doesn't survive logical scrutiny. If other people have access to the standard, can implement the standard, and can build on the standard to create a newer revision of it, I can't imagine what definition of "proprietary" you're using that would apply.
But mDNS is not on the standards track and LLMNR is proposed to be on the standards track. That, I think, is why Stuart has raised the issue. As long as they are Internet-Drafts they all have the same status, work in progress, except that LLMNR has gained WG consensus. Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf