Re: Stopping loss of transparency...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In message <43033596.5040208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian E Carpenter writes:
>Roland,
>
>You can ask some pointed questions using RFC 4084 ("exactly which
>of these descriptions applies to your service, and please show
>me in the contract where you are allowed to change your service
>without notice").  But I suspect that even free copies of
>RFC 1958, 2775, 3234 and 4084 will not be enough to convince them.
>

Publicity might help.  A few years ago, my local cable ISP (Comcast) 
deployed a "transparent" web proxy.  This prompted a lot of outrage, 
including claims that they were violating the wiretap law.  They backed 
down in about a week.

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]