--On tirsdag, august 09, 2005 16:33:46 -0400 John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
And the notion of an AD who has contributed technically to a WG in some significant way then pushing back during IESG review if the WG reaches some other conclusion is pretty close to intolerable. Changing the review model would, presumably, clear that situation up in a hurry.
Only if it does more than just replace "AD" with "reviewer" in the above sentence.
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf