John C Klensin wrote: ...
please note that rejection of a document by the review panel is intended to be A Big Deal.
I don't think this is a detail, so here goes: Today, we DISCUSS documents that have (e.g.) a substantive error in their normative references or an unclear SHOULD that leaves an implementer in doubt. Very often, these are resolved in very few days and the document gets approved before the dust has settled on the DISCUSS. John, is it your intention that this class of issue would result in rejection and thus be A Big Deal? If not, who will detect these small-but-essential issues and who will get them fixed? Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf