On 7/19/05, Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > It also breaks the RFC Editor's REF state into two seperate
> > states - REF-INT, where all of the REF documents are also in
> > the queue, and REF-EXT, where one or more is not. Only
> > REF-EXT is a blocking state.
>
> REF-INT could point to REF-EXT, but you probably check this
> condition.
Yes, and it took me an embarassingly long time to come up with an
algorithm that didn't recurse indefinitely ;-)
> For one case I'm watching the editor queue says
> "REF draft-crocker-abnf-rfc2234bis-00", your script somehow
> decided REF-EXT, maybe it's confused by the trailing -00 (?)
Indeed, the analysis knows to strip off (-[^-]{1,2})?.txt$ from the
ref; I've changed it to make the .txt optional and your example should
be correct in this afternoon's run.
Bill
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf