Re: Port numbers and IPv6 (was: I-D

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Friday, 15 July, 2005 13:54 -0400 John Day
<jeanjour@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> 
>> Does this discussion suggest that it is time to start taking a
>> look at TCPng?  If not now, at some point in the future that
>> we can anticipate?
>> 
>> (those are questions, not proposals, requests, or statements
>> of belief)
> 
> Perhaps, but aren't we about 30 years late in getting rid of
> the kludge of well-known sockets?  Perhaps we should start
> solving problems instead of prolonging the agony.

While I'm not sure I quite share your conclusion about ports and
well-known sockets (I can see some tradeoffs in that area), you
will note that I said "take a look at TCPng" not "make the port
number field wider".

best,
    john


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]