>Yes. And what's the idea ? It's the IETF's statement about having approved the documents, as opposed to the RFC Editor's statement about having the documents in the queue. >So far I took e.g. "draft-crocker-abnf-rfc2234bis-00.txt", >removed "draft-" and "-00.txt" resulting in a fragment id. Unfortunately, whether or not you have to remove the "draft-" depends on who added the document to the queue and when. The RFC Editor said they would be working on getting this consistent but for now it's not very useful. >And that's the position of 2234bis within its category >"non-WG standards track" (chronological). The primary key on the parking area is simply the date (and I'm working on other sort orders). Bill _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf