Bill Fenner wrote: > It should be working now. Yes. And what's the idea ? So far I took e.g. "draft-crocker-abnf-rfc2234bis-00.txt", removed "draft-" and "-00.txt" resulting in a fragment id. "crocker-abnf-rfc2234bis", and added it to the queue URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html#crocker-abnf-rfc2234bis And that's the position of 2234bis within its category "non-WG standards track" (chronological). For a new view on the editor queue it could be interesting to split "blocked" I-Ds (= pending IANA or REF) from the rest, sorting the rest chronologically, if that's the order of processing. Maybe you could add links to the second date (= "entered the queue") to these fragments, e.g. link 2003-01-07 for <http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ips-ifcp-14> to <http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html#draft-ietf-ips-ifcp> Ugh, new rule, don't strip "draft-" for any "draft-ietf-". Apparently that's the oldest "non-blocked" I-D, whatever that means. For a fairer view you might need the date of the "unblocking". Bye, Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf