> *> harmful, and that the best way to insure coverage of IANA issues is to have an > *> explicit check for such things as part of our review process. > *> > As I expect you know, the IANA checks all documents at Last Call time, > and the RFC Editor checks them before publication, for missing missed > IANA actions. However, redundancy does not seem to me to be a bad > idea. Of course I know this. But the tendency will be for the text to be believed and for the review to be less thorough. You're fighting human nature here, and you're gonna lose. Ned _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf