Re: Should the IESG rule or not? and all that...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Keith Moore wrote:
>> 2026 separates process management from _independent_ technical review,
>> IMO for good reason.
> 
> I think you're reading more emphasis on independence than was intended
> in 2026.  But this is also subjective.
> 
>> History reminds us of the abuses of power that started with "act first,
>> appeal later".
> 
> The history of engineering also has lessons for those who act recklessly
> and refused to submit to external review.  The Tacoma Narrows Bridge,
> for instance.

External reviews are what I'm favoring - external, independent reviews.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCzA0YE5f5cImnZrsRAiQAAJ9Ye7Rvytyf3zVPJnfwqdYfOr2A9ACgsEpE
5tg0EaoXkl0dnTE3JvGPaDM=
=ajA6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]