Keith Moore wrote: >>> If IESG people were to personally benefit from their exercise of this >>> "privilege" you'd have a valid gripe. >> >> Personal gain is not the only motive; power can be its own motive. The >> gripes are validated by cases of abuse of privilege. > > If there's no obvious personal interest, whether a particular case is a > valid exercise of discretion or an abuse of privilege is rather > subjective. For those who think a particular case is in the latter > category, we have an appeals process. > > Keith 2026 separates process management from _independent_ technical review, IMO for good reason. History reminds us of the abuses of power that started with "act first, appeal later". Joe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf