On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:07:47PM +0200, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote: > The list of "satisfied" is of ne real interest. The list of "disatistied" > seem important enough to say there is no consensus. No IETF consensus is required to accept or deny a registration for the registry in question under the current rules; instead IESG approval is required instead. And if there is no consensus, then there is also no consensus to change RFC 2780, under which auspices the IESG acted.... - Ted _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf