Hans Kruse wrote:
But the refusal of a code point is not effective, and in fact
counter-productive (since the option will indeed be deployed, you just
won't know what code point it self-assigned).
that's not true in general. each situation is different.
the alternative - to blindly assign codepoints even to poor proposals -
would encourage proliferation of poorly designed extensions to IP.
we need to allow IESG to use some discretion here.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf