On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Ned Freed wrote:
What exactly is it that you
think should be done (in addition to careful reviews) that would help
reduce the odds that the careful review find issues with the IANA
instructions (or lack thereof)?
Simple: The requirement that an IANA considerations section be included in RFC
not containing any IANA actions needs to be dropped. I have been extremely
clear ahout this.
It's good, because this is already the case. Even if you're required
to add a "null" IANA considerations section in the internet-drafts
when being sent to the IESG, the RFC-editor removes the IANA
considerations section completely if it doesn't have any real content.
Anything else?
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf