-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Joe Touch wrote: ... >>> The decision of whether something is an "end run" should be relatively >>> fast. One can always air on the conservative side if in doubt and say >>> "looks like end run", while getting more detailed reviews. >> >> >> >> If in doubt, it's more productive say "MIGHT be an end run" and ask for >> more time. Throwing tar isn't a substitute for hesitating before >> throwing. > > 3932 isn't explicit about asking for more time. It says: > > > The IESG will normally have review done within 4 weeks from the RFC > Editor's notification. In the case of a possible conflict, the IESG > may contact a WG or a WG chair for an outside opinion of whether > publishing the document is harmful to the work of the WG and, in the > case of a possible conflict with an IANA registration procedure, the > IANA expert for that registry. > > Would it be better if the process required an explicit request for > more time? yes, IMO. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCi7dIE5f5cImnZrsRAkMYAJ9Rwq+yMys8nBjg9CCzbQkds6NxSQCaA2o0 cZMv43AOgbK+GfqtWla3vm8= =Io6m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf