The size of an RFC has nothing whatsoever to do with its impact. It takes time for people review, test, document problems, and propose alterations. That's the point of delay and a gradual process. Anyone can give you a one page document that will break just about everything. Because its only one page doesn't mean it should be less well tested and reviewed. Nor does it mean that its somehow easier to test and review. --Dean On Sat, 14 May 2005, Will McAfee wrote: > I think the minimum time before a document can pass to another > standards-track state is ridiculously long. If an rfc is huge, I can > understand that. But to sweep that over all of them? A two-page > proposed standard can take an absolutely ridiculous amount of time to > pass through! I say we have variations based on how long the document > is. > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > -- Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service? www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service 617 344 9000 _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf