> Date: 2005-05-10 13:01 > From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Let's say that it averages 4 months to go from IESG approval to RFC > publication. (I'm choosing that number because it is big enough to indicate a > problem, but small enough not to insult the RFC Editor.) > > Using your estimate of 20% for this step, that means that working groups > average 16 months to do their part of the work, from start to finish. > > However that does not match either general impression or that statistics that > were produced awhile back. > > If we averaged 16 months for working groups to go from start to finish, > we would not have serious and consistent complaints that the IETF is too > slow. OK, I'll bite -- where are the statistics (I know of one WG that has been active for more than 8 years and has set to produce a single document for IESG review; that's got to skew the statistics a bit)? _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf