> Do you actually think that we need an even higher turnover? Or are > you pointing out an historical problem which may have been corrected > over the past two years? I was merely reacting to your assessment that renewal rate by the nom com of less than 25% leads to average terms of 8-10 years, which in my mind is too long. As you point out, in practice, people tend to not stay much longer than 4 years -- and we should thank them for serving even that long. There were a few examples of AD serving for 10 years or more, it is not the case anymore, and that is very well. -- Christian Huitema _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf